Quality
I've been visiting canadiancomment quite a bit lately. If you haven't been there yet, check it out. Bob and Dana post pretty frequently (unlike some other blogs I can think of) and I invariably find something worth reading. It's a heady mix of interesting links and trenchant commentary - and that's about the highest praise I can give a blog.Snap-Crackle-Zinc
I tried to post here a few days ago, but something was messed up with Blogger and it never happened. You sure didn't miss much - just a bitchfest about my health. Speaking of which...That didn't take long!
Wow...I put Arafat's picture up on the site and less than 24 hours later he's dead.Rummy!
From Monday's Press Briefing by U.S. Secretary of Defense, Donald Rumsfeld:Heh...[...]
With that, we'll take your questions.
SEC. RUMSFELD: Charlie?
Q Mr. Secretary, you said that much still needs to be done here at the Pentagon. And as, I guess, the chief architect and champion of transformation, there has been a lot of speculation about your future here. And realizing that you serve at the pleasure of the president, sir, I wonder if you hope and plan to stay on here at the Pentagon and move transformation further down the road and see the Iraq problem through. Would you plan to stay on, sir, for at least a year, say? Or do you hope to stay on?
SEC. RUMSFELD: Charlie. (Laughter.) The president has spoken on this issue. He went to Camp David. He's thinking about his administration for the future. I've met with him two or three times on totally different subjects since the election, but that's not a subject that's come up. And needless to say, either one of us would discuss it with the other before discussing it with you. (Laughter.)
Q Well, would you -- you said --
SEC. RUMSFELD: As much respect as we have for you.[...]
When will it end?
I wonder if something like this is taking place in France as I write this...Wiki-wiki-wiki
Wikipedia...it's not just fun to say. The U.S. Presidential Election 2004 page is a wealth of information. Even better are the links at the bottom to every other U.S. Presidential election. Who carried California in 1912, you ask? Why, Theodore Roosevelt and the Progressive Party (aka the "Bull Moose" party), of course. The maps accompanying most of the historical election pages are great - you can see that North Dakota had 5 electoral votes in 1912...more than Nevada, New Mexico, Arizona, Utah or Wyoming. ND was only one EV behind Florida (6) back then...it boggles the mind.That wasn't so bad now, was it?
Earlier this year I called Bush to win the presidency and carry 49 states (Kerry winning Massachusetts and D.C.). I didn't have a blog back then, but I can put you in touch with some people who heard my outrageous prediction and can vouch for me.